Monday, January 21, 2008

Fighting Back Against Real ID

On May 11, 2005, the REAL ID Act was passed as part of a military spending bill. On March 2, 2007, enforcement was postponed to December 2009 and then again until 2011. What is the REAL ID Act? The theory is that it will tighten our borders and prevent another 9/11. One of the ways it attempts to do this is establish a national standard for driver's licenses / state identification cards and then establish a linked database. The problems with this act are numerous. First, the federal government is interfering with a state issue. Second, the federal government is not only mandating this, but requiring the states to foot the bill. Third, by linking the state databases together and having a national standard, we are basically at a national ID card - something that has been resisted because it brings to mind the idea of the Soviet Union and needing papers to travel from state to state. Fourth, it is wasteful spending in that most, if not all, of the 9/11 hijackers had valid ID. They would not have been flagged any differently than they were on that day. (Information about the REAL ID Act taken from Wikipedia.)

Unfortunately, my state, California has decided to go right along with the federal government. Montana, however, has led the charge in refusing to go along. Other states are also opposing the legislation. The Department of Homeland Security has stated that those who do not have a valid Real ID license (or other federally recognized ID such as a passport) will not be able to use their license as ID for federal purposes. This includes boarding airplanes without being subjected to increased security checks. The DHS is betting that citizens will complain to and blame their state governments. State governments are betting that citizens will agree with them and place the blame fully on the DHS. Citizens of these states will need to start providing alternative ID or be subjected to further security checks as of May 11, 2008. Not only will air travel be hindered, but you'll need a federal ID to "open a bank account, collect Social Security payments, or take advantage of nearly any government service."

I fear it's too late for California, but those in a state where there has not been major headway made can still contact your state leaders and push back against Real ID.

Update 1: Looks like there is some money available, but it basically amounts to pennies on the dollar.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

One World Government is just a step away!

CRCHAIR said...

I have a tough time deciding on this issue. Many of us would agree that it is too easy for illegal aliens to get valid and/or counterfeit IDs. Where we draw the line in our countermeasures is the hard part.

Nomad said...

There is another problem with IDs like this. The more apparently "fool-proof" an ID is, the less human intelligence is used to vet the holder. I know from my own experiences that if you hand someone a drivers license as proof of identity, they are far less likely to actually look at you because by having the DL, they have all they need to fill out their paperwork. No matter that the guy pictured is a black male, and the person making the purchase is a white female.

RealID will not actually help anything, but only make us feel better and thus stop people from actually using their eyes.

"Nick" said...

This is the principle behind most of the security stuff... people will "feel" more secure... does it help... meh.

I point to LAX TSA employees missing 60% of the bombs that testers tried to smuggle onto airplanes.

It does look like quite a few states are fighting this, so... we'll see.

"Nick" said...

This is the principle behind most of the security stuff... people will "feel" more secure... does it help... meh.

I point to LAX TSA employees missing 60% of the bombs that testers tried to smuggle onto airplanes.

It does look like quite a few states are fighting this, so... we'll see.